A new low

Girls think guys have an easier time of it with our junk. In many ways we do. We go faster doing wee wees because we don't usually sit. And while we have strangely vulnerable nut sacks, again, a fail for the Intelligent Design folks (1), we don't have to endure the menstrual cycle on the physiological level. Plus we can scribe characters in urine-friendly surfaces. 

However here's something girls will rarely ever do—accidentally piss on the waistband of their pjs then have to walk to the dresser, the wee-soaked elasticised waistband held out well away from the body as if they were a now-thin person showing off their tremendous weight loss by the hilarious wearing of their once-were-fat pants (2), to get changed. 

Plus chances are if it does happen then it will have happened to a pair of the primos; that pair of pj bottoms that are the most preferred of the total available units in the pj stable. The sort of pair you change out of another pair for because the dryer just finished and you had remembered inside it was a lovely clean and now wonderfully dry pair of primos you could shimmy into for an enhanced bed wear clothing wearing to bed experience.

Poor literally pissed-on primos.

Anyway, those are my views. That girls have the edge on a junk-match up because they are less likely to spray themselves or clothes with their own piss. Also I heard that prop masters on pornos will allow actresses to use apple juice if they're not up to crafting their own shower fuel. Or did I dream it?

(1) Also lady parts are far more aesthetically pleasing to the eye, I think. All that phallic imagery men thrust into the world seems merely to be over-compensation for feelings of genital-beauty inadequacy.
(2) Jared!